The "Fatal Flaw" Syndrome: There is an axiom out there that could keep a lot of money in investors' pockets if they would only remember it: If something is too good to be true--it is. That applies to arbitration, too. No case is perfect. If you can't see a flaw, then something is probably wrong. Find the flaw, then find a way to turn it to your advantage. If you can't, at least you can bring it up first, and dispose of it in your claim.

Important note: The best way to determine your suitability for particular investments, or your reasonableness in relying on certain promises, or in calculating damages, is to look over your current and past account statements. If you are trying to determine suitability or reasonable reliance,go back to your prior, concurrent or subsequent accounts. Don't make the mistake of thinking you can hide anything. No matter what your motivation, you are risking a fatal error. More good cases have been lost through an investor's mistaken belief that "That isn't relevant," than any other cause. And never assume what your damages may be without taking the time to calculate them directly from your statements.

In summary, when you evaluate your case, ask yourself these questions:

Is there a viable someone to go after?

Can I force this person/firm to arbitrate?

Do I have a valid claim?

Do I have a valid loss?

Can I prove all of this to a neutral party?